Miracle on (and Under) Second Avenue

A New York City off-again, and now on-again, public infrastructure project depends upon intense collaboration between architects and engineers
This course is no longer active
[ Page 2 of 4 ]  previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 next page
From Architectural Record
Sara Hart

1. The Second Avenue Subway Stations, whether vaulted or rectangular in profile, are column-free to the extent possible. This structural strategy will improve passenger flow, visibility, and security. In order to achieve the column-free structure without excessive cost or large beam depths, economical structural spans and spacing modules are incorporated into station design.

2. The underplatform and overtrack exhaust systems are central to the air-tempering and ventilation strategies. Exhaust ducts and fans will remove air from areas closest to the two largest sources of heat in the station-the brakes and car air conditioners. In the winter, by turning these exhaust systems off, enough heat will be retained within the station to render mechanical heating unnecessary.

3. During a fire, the mechanical system operates in an emergency mode and extracts smoke from the tunnel and underground stations. Simultaneously, the system provides fresh air to passenger egress areas, to create zones of higher air pressure and to minimize migration of smoke.

4. The lighting design for the Second Avenue Subway will improve the passenger experience with brightly lit walls, enhanced lighting at transition points, and the use of daylight, especially at entrances. Energy-efficient technologies, in concert with a stationwide lighting control system, will be incorporated throughout.

5. The new subway line's signage will employ both fixed and variable messaging elements. The centrally controlled variable-messaging system will display updated train information and emergency information. Fixed and variable signage will be integrated into the architectural features to increase visual clarity and enhance navigation.

6. Through geometry and the strategic use of sound-absorptive materials, the stations will provide comfortable aural environments with a clear and intelligible public address system.

Although many alternatives are identified for every stage, all decisions must answer to a higher power-the assessments of the painstakingly researched environmental-impact statement. Because the SAS project is the beneficiary of federal funding, such an evaluation was required prior to construction in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. The client and the FTA recently completed the final environmental impact statement (FEIS). The document notes that although it is final with regard to starting construction, it can be amended as previously unaddressed issues or unanticipated complications arise.

Some of the many factors the FEIS takes into account are the project's potential effects on transit service and roadway congestion, and social and economic conditions. It also considers issues such as air quality, noise and vibration, energy and natural resource use, and contaminated material disposal. Mitigation measures to reduce localized impacts are described in the document. These are requirements, not guidelines. Assessments are based on "reasonable worst-case scenarios," which means that while there may be alternatives for any given process, the FEIS evaluated the one with the greatest potential for disruption. The assumption is that approved alternatives, by definition, fall within the limits set by the FEIS for the worst-case scenario.

 

[ Page 2 of 4 ]  previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 next page
Originally published in Architectural Record.
Originally published in August 2007

Notice

Academies