Tall Buildings

Sponsored by Construction Specialties
Architectural Record
By Alexandra A. Seno, Joann Gonchar, FAIA, Clifford A. Pearson, and Jeremy Hanson
 
1 AIA LU/HSW; 0.1 IACET CEU*; 1 AIBD P-CE; AAA 1 Structured Learning Hour; This course can be self-reported to the AANB, as per their CE Guidelines; AAPEI 1 Structured Learning Hour; This course can be self-reported to the AIBC, as per their CE Guidelines.; MAA 1 Structured Learning Hour; This course can be self-reported to the NLAA.; This course can be self-reported to the NSAA; NWTAA 1 Structured Learning Hour; OAA 1 Learning Hour; SAA 1 Hour of Core Learning

Learning Objectives:

  1. Discuss earthquake-resistant technologies suitable for tall buildings and alternatives to code-prescribed seismic design methods.
  2. Describe several types of envelope systems that can reduce heat gain and glare.
  3. Describe strategies for ensuring occupant comfort suited to tall buildings and diverse climates.
  4. Discuss ideas for creating public space within dense urban environments.

This course is part of the Resiliency Academy

[ Page 3 of 5 ]  previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 next page

Sky Shaper

The tallest office building west of the Mississippi gives the city by the bay a sleek new landmark.

By Joann Gonchar, FAIA

The Salesforce Tower has been an undeniable presence on San Francisco’s skyline for some time—since long before the spring of 2017, when it topped out. But now, with the completion of the 61-story, 1,070-foot-tall skyscraper earlier this year, the Pelli Clarke Pelli Archi­tects–designed project has officially earned the titles of the city’s tallest structure and the tallest office building west of the Mississippi.

PHOTOGRAPHY: © JASON O’REAR

TAPERED FIT
The Salesforce Tower surpasses the height of the city's next-tallest building, the Transamerica Pyramid (far left) by more than 200 feet.

Of course, critics have decried the Salesforce Tower as the inappropriate Manhattanization of San Francisco. But though it is big (it encloses 1.4 million square feet) and is highly visible, it doesn’t loom. Square in plan, with rounded corners, the top third of the obelisk softly tapers. And while it might seem at first glance to be just another glass-clad tower that could have been built anywhere, it has features that make it a fitting symbol of this rapidly changing city and its startup economy, including a 150-foot-tall perforated-metal screen at the pinnacle: by day it helps the building’s top dissolve into the sky and conceals unsightly mechanical equipment, but at night, the scrim transforms into a giant canvas for an installation by local LED artist Jim Campbell.

Surpassing San Francisco’s former record holder, the 1972 Transamerica Pyramid, by more than 200 feet, the Salesforce Tower is nearly impossible to miss from almost any spot in San Francisco and beyond. But, at one point, it was not clear if the project—whose gestation period ended up being more than 10 years—would even get off the ground. In 2007, the developer Hines and architects Pelli Clarke Pelli won a competition with their proposal for the skyscraper and an adjacent transit hub, with a 5.4-acre public park on top designed by PWP Landscape Architecture. The two buildings, then known as the Transbay Tower and the Transbay Terminal, were conceived as the centerpieces of a much larger redevelopment zone at the edge of the city’s financial district, made possible in part by the demolition of an elevated freeway damaged in the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.

But the Great Recession that hit in late 2008 put the brakes on the tower’s construction. Ground wasn’t broken until 2013, after Boston Properties became the lead developer, assuming a 95 percent stake in the project. Later, the cloud-computing company Salesforce would acquire the naming rights for the skyscraper, with a lease for what would eventually total 900,000 square feet, including the two top floors. Subsequently, the company would also put its name on the transit center and the rooftop park, which are slated to open next month.

PHOTOGRAPHY: © TIM GRIFFITH (RIGHT); JASON O’REAR (LEFT)

UP ON THE ROOF
The tower was conceived together with a transit hub topped by a 5.4-acre public park (right). The four-block-long transit station’s bus deck bridges over several streets and is enclosed in a lacelike skin (left, bottom of image).

In the post-crash economic climate, the design team naturally faced pressure to be exceedingly practical. However, Fred Clarke, senior principal at Pelli Clarke Pelli, claims that no design sacrifices were made. He points to refinements like the rounded-glass corners, which consist of curved insulated glass panels rather than being assembled from faceted flat panes. And he calls out the exterior aluminum sunshades. The gridded system sits proud of the glass skin, adding texture and depth. Its white epoxy coating contains mica to make the most of the quality of light that is particular to San Francisco.

Still, there were some challenging developer demands, including a directive that there be no elements that would interfere with the tower’s dramatic views or that would hinder office layouts. For the structural engineer, Magnusson Klemencic Associates, this meant that the building could not rely on the typical seismic systems generally found in skyscrapers in earthquake-prone San Francisco. “There could be no perimeter braces, no outrigger trusses, no belt trusses,” says Ron Klemencic, chairman and CEO of the Seattle-based firm. Instead, the lateral system is confined to the 85-foot-square reinforced-concrete core with walls that are 4 feet thick at the base. Perim­eter columns take only the gravity loads. There are three of these per face, placed about 40 feet apart, and none at the all-important curved corners or within the interior of the 25,000-square-foot floor plates. But even without a readily apparent seismic system, the tower is designed to sway 25 percent less in a quake than a more conventional one, says Klemencic.

PHOTOGRAPHY: © JASON O’REAR (LEFT); VITTORIA ZUPICICH (RIGHT)

MAKING AN ENTRANCE
At the ground, the highly transparent façade, supported by a system of horizontal trusses and cable nets, puts the marble-and-chrome lobby on display.

PHOTOGRAPHY: COURTESY PELLI CLARKE PELLI ARCHITECTS

Above street level, the building’s aluminum sunshade grid, which sits proud of the skin, adds texture and depth.

This “quiet” but robust superstructure sits on a mat foundation with piles that extend more than 300 feet to bedrock. The team made the decision to go that deep at the outset of the project, when the sinking and listing of nearby Millennium Tower was known in construction circles, but before it had been widely publicized. The condominium building’s piles only go down about 70 feet, to the Colma clay layer.

But arguably more notable than the depth of the Salesforce Tower foundations, or the seemingly straightforward configuration of its superstructure, is the process used to engineer them—a methodology known as performance-based seismic design (PBSD). Under this alternative to code-prescribed techniques, designers and owners can develop an enhanced level of earthquake performance and devise a scheme tailored to that outcome. Because PBSD depends on sophisticated computer-modeling techniques, engineers are able to “interrogate and analyze” the structure to determine the response of the building to ground motion and then “fine-tune and allocate strength where it is needed,” says Klemencic. Salesforce Tower provides an enhanced level of protection, beyond what is mandated by code for buildings with more than 5,000 occupants.

PHOTOGRAPHY: © TIM GRIFFITH

LIGHT SHOW
The scrim at the tower’s pinnacle becomes a canvas at night for an LED installation by artist Jim Campbell.

PHOTOGRAPHY: COURTESY SALESFORCE


The office floors for Salesforce employees (left) are non-hierarchical, without private offices. Spaces for informal collaboration include a loungelike area with sofas and upholstered chairs (right).

This advanced engineering will only be tested in an extreme event, of course. But other building systems will have an effect on occupants’ day-to-day well-being. Clarke touts the energy-conserving air-conditioning system. It takes advantage of outdoor air and San Francisco’s mild climate to provide “free cooling” when conditions are right. In conjunction with raised floor distribution, the system should improve indoor air quality and thermal comfort. It is one of many features that have helped the tower’s core and shell garner a LEED Platinum certification.

The Salesforce offices are also on track to earn their own Platinum rating. Mark Cavagnero Associates (MCA), working with Interior Architects, has designed the Salesforce floors, creating a non-hierarchical environment intended to encourage teamwork. The scheme includes “neighborhoods,” each comprising three floors connected with a communicating stair. Instead of private offices, the workplace has unassigned, open desks. In addition to conference rooms enclosed almost entirely in glass, there are spaces for less formal collaboration and socializing, including a kitchenette and a loungelike area with sofas and upholstered chairs. These more relaxed spaces occupy the prime part of each floor plate—the side that overlooks the park atop the transit center. “Marc wanted the best views and best light to be shared,” says MCA’s founding partner, Mark Cavagnero, referring to Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff.

Benioff’s workplace-as-community philosophy extends to the building’s top floor, which has dramatic views of the Golden Gate Bridge, Coit Tower, and the piers along the Embarcadero. There Cavagnero is creating a gathering and event space with a large kitchen and a café, rather than executive offices, as one might expect. The facility is envisioned as a “living room” of which customers, employees, their families, and even the public could take advantage.

This floor is still under construction, so it is too soon to know just how accessible this space will be to non-Salesforce employees. But in many respects, the tower is already proving a success. Its leasing is virtually complete—with tenants that include coworking giant WeWork, consulting firm Accenture, and real-estate brokerage CBRE—but its impact is even further-reaching. The tower has refocused the energy of downtown with a sophisticated new skyline topper emblematic of the future.

Credits

ARCHITECT: Pelli Clarke Pelli — Cesar Pelli, Fred Clarke, Edward Dionne, Chris Herring, IIeana Dumitriu, project team

ARCHITECT OF RECORD: Kendall-Heaton Associates

CONSULTANTS: Magnusson Klemencic Associates (structural); WSP Group (m/e/p); BKF Engineers (civil); Arup (geotechnical); Morrison Hershfield (curtain wall); Stok (environmental); HLB Lighting Design (lighting); PWP Landscape Architecture, RHAA (landscape)

GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Clark Hathaway Dinwiddie Joint Venture

CLIENT: Boston Properties, Inc., Hines Interests Limited Partnership

SIZE: 1.4 million square feet

CONSTRUTION COST: withheld

COMPLETION DATE: May 2018

Sources

CURTAIN WALL: Benson Industries

GLAZING: Guardian Industries

LOBBY STONE: Campolonghi

LIGHTING: Lithonia Lighting, LaMar Lighting, Luna, Birchwood, Gotham, Selux, Lumenpulse, Boca Flasher, Lucifer, Elliptipar, USAI, AION LED, Finelite, AXIS

This test is no longer available for credit
[ Page 3 of 5 ]  previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 next page
Originally published in Architectural Record
Originally published in July 2018

Notice

Academies