Carbon Footprint
In addition to the aesthetic and design capabilities proffered by MCMs, one area where metal really shines is in the arena of sustainability.
Due to the fabricated nature of MCM production, metal members are precisely engineered and created to each project’s customized specifications. This means that the use of metal is fully optimized during fabrication and construction process and very little, if any, material is wasted.
And because there are many production facilities in different regions around the country, building owners and architects have the opportunity to regionally source their metal fabricated panels.
To investigate metal’s sustainability factors the Metal Construction Association commissioned environmental consultant thinkstep to perform a study entitled, “Life-Cycle Assessment of Metal Construction Association Production Processes, Metal Roof and Wall Panel Products.”
As reported in a MCA Architectural Record CEU “The ABCs of LCAs and EPDs,” Trisha Montalbo, senior consultant with thinkstep in Boston, stated that a high level of recyclability is one of metal’s strongest environmental attributes. “Additionally, with respect to carbon footprint and demand for nonrenewable energy resources, most of the metal wall assemblies were preferable to the concrete-based assemblies.”
Another key finding of the study reported that the appropriate treatment of waste material can significantly reduce a product’s environmental profile while the transportation of goods and materials is considered minor within the context of the overall manufacturing process.
Another study was commissioned by the Metal Building Manufacturers Association and performed by Walter P. Moore and Associates found metal buildings to display lower environmental impacts in all six metrics as compared to load-bearing masonry walls, concrete, tilt-up, and steel-framed construction of the same building footprint and functional equivalence. For the types of building where metal buildings are typically most economical, the report concluded that metal generally performs better in life-cycle analyses and produce the least embodied building material impact.
Fire Protection
Another important issue with MCMs is ensuring fire protection, particularly in light of advancements in the National Fire Protection Association NFPA 285-23 Standard Fire Test Method for Evaluation of Fire Propagation Characteristics of Exterior Non-Load-Bearing Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components performance requirements for limiting fire propagation in building assemblies contained combustible materials.
Offering a little perspective on the evolution of this important standard, John Valiulis, P.E., technical director of the International Firestop Council stated in a Fire Engineering magazine article, “The fire protection engineering community in the U.S. foresaw the increasing use of combustible components in exterior wall construction decades ago. The test method, which today is titled NFPA 285, has resulted in an existing building stock with exterior walls that have exhibited a resistance to self-propagating fires.”
The main fire-related issue with an MCM system is the panel core sandwiched between the two metal facers. MCM panels have been developed with a thermoplastic core that resists the propagation of flames and these panels are commonly used where compliance with NFPA 285-23 is required by local and national building codes.
MCM panel systems made with fire-retardant FR core perform well when tested to the NFPA 285-23 standard. The FR core is made with fire-retardant compounds that break down to create water vapor when subjected to extreme heat. This water vapor helps suppress flame spread, and causes the material to self-extinguish once the flame source is removed.
The large-scale, two-story test involves a number of detailed requirements limiting the extent of flame spread over the test wall assembly. Consequently, if an exterior assembly using MCM panels meets the performance criteria of this standard, there is a high level of assurance for the fire protection and safety of building occupants.
The most recent version of the NFPA 285-23 contains valuable guidance in the appendix on the level and type of modification that can be considered for a project based on a successfully tested assembly. This evaluation would be made by a registered design professional and allows for the project design flexibility.
Visual Acceptance Parameters Beyond The Codes
While the International Building and Fire Codes define a number of exterior cladding performance requirements—including material performance, structural integrity, and allowable deflection limits—a number of flatness and localized issues, such as denting and colorfastness, are not specifically addressed within the code.
To highlight the industry standards for perceived “defects” in MCM panel installations, and essentially promote a higher standard for these systems, MCA developed a useful white paper titled, Visual Acceptance Parameters for Metal Composite Material Panels and Panel Systems.
The document identifies four main areas: panel deflection, panel bow, surface imperfections, and finish performance and color fastness. Panel Deflection: Metal panel deflection is generally caused by two factors: wind load and thermal movement of the panel due to temperature change. Any expansion and contraction commonly resulting in panel deflection can easily be addressed with proper design, fabrication, and installation techniques.
Of note, MCM cladding is allowed by code to have a panel deflection of L/60, which recognizes the ability of metal cladding to deflect a considerable amount and still return to its original position without yielding the material.
Panel Bow: When subjected to a change in ambient temperature, a restraint in an MCM panel can cause panel bow. The movement causes the panel to grow as the temperature rises and shrink as the temperature declines. These dimensional changes are directly related to these temperature changes in the panels when compared to the installation temperature. For example, with aluminum panels, this change in temperature can easily vary +/- 100°F from the installation temperature and cause a change in panel length of 1/8-in (per 8 feet in length) or more. If this is not considered in the panel system design, fabrication, and installation, this level of panel movement may cause visual panel bowing.
Further, movement within the structure itself, or the sub-framing may directly impact the panel flatness. Consequently, the load deflection criteria of the panel system and connection methods should be coordinated with the load deflection criteria of the primary support system to control movement and reduce significant panel bowing. To address these issues prior to installation, panel fabrication often includes slotted holes in panel framing members or use of adhesives that allow some panel movement.
Panels are usually installed with a fixed point in the center of the panel, allowing for expansion and contraction of the panel in both directions from the fixed point. While this technique can become particularly difficult around openings and at building corners, proper planning can minimize this difficulty.
Finally, consideration must be given to allow free panel movement. This means that fasteners generally should not be torqued tight against connecting extrusions, effectively locking the panels in place.
In sum, as objectionable as panel bow can be on a project, the effect is generally temporary and will often subside as the panel approaches the installation temperature.
Surface Imperfections: Not specifically addressed within the code, Imperfections typically include surface dents, dimples, abnormal core defects, and defects within the metal facing material.
As defined by the Insulated Glass Manufacturers Association’s insulating glass units and American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) 2605 Section 5.2, the Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for Superior Performing Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels, a visual inspection is made when standing 10 feet from the surface at a 90° angle, typically under natural exterior lighting conditions.
If imperfections are identified, they should be indicated to the installer for investigation and possible remediation or replacement.
Finish Performance and Color Fastness: Also not specifically addressed in the building codes, finish criteria are often defined in detail in the project specifications. These performance characteristics include, but not limited to hardness, impact resistance, wear resistance, humidity, and corrosion resistance, as defined by various ASTM, AAMA and NCCA standards.
Color fastness is measured under laboratory conditions and compares a sample of the project panel to a production control sample using one of several standard test methods.
A cleaning and maintenance standard should be included to sustain the finish of the MCM panel systems. Also of note, the performance characteristic of the detergent resistance used for cleaning should conform to the chemical resistance criteria specified in AAMA 2605.
For more information, visit:
Working With Certified MCM Fabricators
When designing MCM exteriors, architects can significantly boost the quality of the installed panels by working with certified MCM fabricators.
Photos courtesy of 3A Composites USA
Miles Associates chose MCM for the interior design of the 65,000-square-foot atrium of the Children’s Hospital at Oklahoma University Medical Center in Oklahoma City.
Developed by MCA’s Metal Composite Material Council, certification is based on experience, the extent of services offered—i.e., project design, fabrication, installation, in-house engineering—meeting industry performance requirements, and demonstrating the company’s level of financial strength, thereby offering assurance that the company can support large projects.
For example, fabricators earn qualification points by meeting standard performance testing such as:
- ASTM E 283 Static Air Infiltration standard of no more than 0.06 cubic ft. per minute per sq. ft. at 6.24 pounds per sq. ft. (PSF) of loading
- ASTM E 330 Structural Design Load where deflection of framing members doesn’t exceed L/60 of the clear span or anchor deflection doesn’t exceed 1/16 inch at +/– 30 PSF.3
- ASTM E 331 Static Water Infiltration with no uncontrolled water passing from the panel system onto the substrate at 12.0 PSF loading
- AAMA 508 or 509 for rainscreen installation systems
In terms of quality of the services that certified MCM fabricators offer to architects, these premium subcontractors create project and shop drawings and often provide engineering calculations to verify the adequacy of the panel system design. The fabricator also takes responsibility for designing, sourcing, and fabricating all structural components including extruded aluminum, fasteners, and clips.
Quality control procedures used by certified subcontractors can identify problems early, before installation, avoiding time-consuming delays and modifications. In addition, by selecting selected certified MCM fabricators, architects are ensuring that the fabricated systems will meet performance requirements in the area of water penetration, structural performance, and visual appearance.
In Conclusion
While MCMs are more commonly used in a variety of commercial applications for today’s buildings, many architects may not be aware of the extent of their capabilities in the realm of design. From unique shapes and curves to textures and patterns to bold and trendy colors, MCMs are an amazing tool in an architect’s design toolbox.
Sustainable and cost effective, this long-lasting, exceptional fire protection material is a great option for projects seeking both sleek, stand-out designs and more traditional facades. As more retail, healthcare, office, automotive, convention centers, and multi-family buildings select MCM wall cladding, their popularity is expected to continue growing.
Barbara Horwitz-Bennett is a veteran architectural journalist who has written hundreds of CEUs and articles for various AEC publications. BHBennett.com