Materials Matter

Measuring the environmental footprint of wood, concrete and steel is a big factor in designing sustainable buildings.
This course is no longer active
[ Page 3 of 9 ]  previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 next page
Sponsored by reThink Wood

The LifeCycle Tower system was conceived as a way to maximize the use of timber for buildings up to 30 stories.

Photo courtesy of www.creebyrhomberg.com

As noted, LCA studies consistently show advantages for wood in terms of embodied energy and other impact indicators. As Peter Busby, Managing Director of Perkins+Will, likes to put it, "Wood is a renewable building material made by the sun. Trees are a major vehicle on the globe to reduce carbon," he says. "They're our ally in keeping the biosphere healthy."

Michael Green, MAIBC, AIA, MRAIC, Principal of Michael Green Architecture in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, believes that, "All materials have their place, and no material is an all-out winner." But for Green, the overriding issue is carbon. "More than five percent of the carbon we put into the atmosphere comes from concrete.4 Steel, too, has a heavy environmental impact. As architects we have to ask ourselves: is there a material that minimizes or eliminates carbon in the environment? While some of the actual numbers in these analyses may be arguable, what's not in doubt is that wood stores carbon, and that it's our only carbon-neutral structural option."

As it turns out, architects are asking themselves that question. For example, carbon reduction was a primary goal for CREE GmbH, which created the timber-based LifeCycle Tower (LCT) system for buildings up to 30 stories. Built around a central stiffening core for the elevator, stairs and shafts, the system includes prefabricated wood/concrete panels supported on the exterior by glulam posts. To date, it has been used for an eight-story building in Austria, and other projects are on the horizon. CREE claims that, compared to conventional construction, the aptly named LifeCycle Tower will require less than half the time to build and see a 90 percent reduction in carbon emissions. Busby, who calls the tower "amazing," says, "The technology to use wood in taller buildings is there. British Columbia relaxed its codes to allow six-story wood buildings. As we see more changes in this direction, we'll see taller buildings in wood."

Moving Ahead

Cross-laminated timber will provide increased opportunity to use wood in commercial structures.

Photo courtesy of FPInnovations

As the movement to carbon-neutral buildings takes hold, makers of building materials are well aware of the need to improve the environmental footprint of their products. Both the steel and concrete industries are working to improve the efficiency of manufacturing and construction processes as well as the environmental and structural properties of their products. According to the World Steel Association, in the last 30 years the steel industry has reduced its energy consumption per ton of steel produced by 50 percent. However, the association says that there is now likely only room for marginal further improvement on the basis of existing technology. Further environmental gains will come through breakthrough steelmaking technologies, next-generation steels in lighter and stronger products as well as recycling and the use of byproducts to power steel mills or other types of factories.

In terms of concrete, research out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology indicates that Insulated Concrete Form (ICF) homes have been shown to provide 20 percent energy savings in the form of reduced heating, cooling and ventilation needs as compared to conventional wood-framed construction.5 The findings also note, "There are measurable differences between alternative construction systems, and that the thermal mass of concrete can provide energy savings over a life cycle of 75 years." While ICF technology has been around for some 50 years, only recently has there been a significant increase in ICF structures in cost-sensitive commercial, industrial and multi-family markets.

Technical innovations in wood, too, involve increased potential in the commercial sector. Architect Michael Green is part of the emerging movement to consider wood as a building material for larger, taller commercial structures. Together with Eric Karsh of Equilibrium Consulting, Green published The Case for Tall Wood Buildings: How Mass Timber Offers a Safe, Economical and Environmentally Friendly Alternative for Tall Building Structures. As a rationale for the expanded use of wood, he points to the new generation of mass timber products such as cross laminated timber (CLT), which have already gained wide acceptance elsewhere in the world. CLT has been used to build (among others) a 10-story apartment building in Australia and eight- and nine-story buildings in the United Kingdom, and is now available to North American building designers.

Green sees new structural opportunities for wood beginning to mushroom, much like they did more than a century ago with the advent of steel. "We're looking at radically new systems made of wood that make sense from a carbon, sustainability and forestry standpoint and that are realistic competitors to steel and concrete," says Green.

 

[ Page 3 of 9 ]  previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 next page
Originally published in Architectural Record
Originally published in March 2011

Notice

Academies